Same old Congress, and same old story for District 9
28,533 votes, 99% reporting (528 of 532 precincts) The last four put her at 53%. What is that?
Was this tight margin a wake-up for Yvette Clarke? Yes, she doubled her campaign funds in 2019. Will she enjoy the expense of another challenge in 2020? Apparently. Adem’s job was difficult and it remains so. He is as smart as AOC, but never says anything so strong from the progressive left that can set your hair on fire the way she can.
Adem is a highly qualified male with the smarts to do the job of a congress member, but that does not defeat an incumbent, and in a decade hopefully dedicated to the empowerment of women, this is his most difficult communication problem. A massive call-out on Clarke’s record, that is on the surface reasonably good strategy, but requires extensive analysis in a debate covering the obscurity of Congress. If the point shuts down everyone’s brain, there is no point.
First, Clarke’s failures are clear – she has not “brought home bacon”, injected substantial funding into anti-displacement organizations, or protected constituents (especially Haitians) and others from the threat of deportation. These failures will be the legacy of her next two years. Why? Clarke, her staff, and her utility (gas, elec. trav. corp.) PACs have never written legislation that could get out of committee or put money in District 9 favoring working families facing relentless increases in the cost of living, led by the crisis in housing affordability.
The second lesson is in knowing that in 2018 less than 30,000 votes occurred among more than 300,000 registered Democrats in a District with nearly 800,000 residents. This means one thing, the Congressmember’s staff will continue to ignore “off-list” letters and phone calls, and continue to vote with a leadership that has demonstrated an ability to fail nationally until 2018 slapped them in the face. Too little too late said the little blue state as it looked into the dark cold eyes of the Senate.
Lastly, our one NYC candidate right out of the Bernie Sanders camp is worthy of further analysis. She won the 14th District using solid community organizing skills, not political organizing expertise. It was geographically organized by election district (See District Nine example). In my opinion, I believe the reliance on a Crown Heights base was the failure of the challenger’s strategy in the Ninth District. A look at the whole district would have produced two the four thousand more votes. Ocasio-Cortez won with straightforward organizing throughout the entire district.
One person working to get the vote out in nearly every district (mostly Bronx) was all Alexandria needed in a non-presidential election year. In her district, the threat to the people there was as tangible as it is in CD9 for the threatened people of the Carribean, but she got that message out. This is a huge deal, Crowley was a boss-machine player among Democrats. (Time Mag Story) It was her organizing performance that produced a substantial margin for victory. Something Democrats seem to forget.
If the pressure for real leadership is to occur one for a challenger, a person will be needed in every ED by June 2020. See District Nine example
The Big News Maker was: U.S. House District 14
27,658 votes, 98% reporting (440 of 449 precincts)
The rest of 26 June’s pathetic primary voting turnout can be reviewed here